Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0390220040150010088
Journal of Clinical Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery
2004 Volume.15 No. 1 p.88 ~ p.92
Comparison between the Conventional and Minimal Incision for the Cochlear Implantation
Kim Shi-Chan

Abstract
Background and Objectives£ºThe surgical complications of the cochlear implantation are rare but most of them are flap-related. The author simplified the previous minimal incision with operating microscope only. The minimal incision method was compared retrospectively with the conventional incision method. Materials and Methods£ºThe approach with ¡°V¡± shaped incision less than 4 cm was done to nine patients. Eight patients were done with the conventional ¡°S¡± shaped incision. These results of the both methods were analyzed. Results£ºThere is no major complication in both groups. One case of the conventional method group showed the hematoma. One case with the minimal incision method showed the erythema. Conclusions£ºThe minimal incision surgery for the cochlear implant is possible to perform without major complications and large scars.
KEYWORD
Cochlear implantation, Surgical procedure, minimally invasive
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)